Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of the studies included in the review

From: Are interventions to increase the uptake of screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study (Author, year, country)

Population

Type of screening

Setting

Intervention

Related CVR Outcome measures for uptake rate

Randomized/cluster randomized controlled trials

 McDowell, 1989

Canada [47]

Adults aged ≥18 yearsa

BP

Primary care practice

3 intervention groups:

1. Physician reminder (computer-based reminder)

2. Patient reminder (telephone)

3. Patient reminder (letter)

Control: usual care

BP

 Robson, 1989

UK [50]

Patients aged 30–64 yearsa

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

Dedicated personnel: health promotion nurse

Control: doctor worked alone

BP, smoking history, cholesterol, family history of heart attack

 Ornstein, 1991

USA [48]

Patients aged ≥18 yearsa

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

3 intervention groups:

1. Physician reminder (paper based)

2. patient reminder (letter)

3. physician and patient reminder (multifaceted approach)

Control: usual care

Cholesterol

 Apkon, 2005

USA [51]

Patients aged ≥18 yearsa

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

Physician reminders (computer based) vs. usual care

Lipid, smoking screening

 Kenealy, 2005

New Zealand [37]

Adults aged 50 years or oldera

Diabetes screening

Primary care practice

3 intervention arms:

1. Physician reminder (flash alert in computer screen)

2. Physician reminder (patient giving the completed diabetes risk self-assessment form to the doctor)

3. Both 1 & 2 (multifaceted approach)

Control: usual care

Glucoseb

 Harari, 2008

UK [52]

Adults aged ≥65 yearsa

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

Health Risk Appraisal via mailed questionnaire and feedback to participants and general practitioners (multifaceted approach) vs. usual care

BP, cholesterol, blood glucose

 van Wyk, 2008

Netherland [49]

Men aged 18 to 70 years and women aged 18 to 75 yearsa

cholesterol

Primary care practice

2 intervention for physician reminder (computer based) vs. usual care:

1. Auto-alert

2. On demand alert

Cholesterol

 Holt, 2010

UK [60]

patients aged 50–74 years identified as probable high-risk

CVRs

Primary care practice

Physicians reminder (computer based screen alerts vs. usual care

Overall CVRs

 Stocks, 2012

Australia [58]

Patients aged 40–74 years

CVRs

Primary care practice

Financial incentives (added voucher incentives) vs. usual care (free test)

Overall CVRs

 Grunfeld, 2013

Canada [27]

Adults aged 40–65 years

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

3 intervention arms:

1. Dedicated personnel (practice facilitator at practice level)

2. Dedicated personnel (prevention practitioner at patient level)

3. Multifaceted approach (both 1&2)

control: usual care

FBS, BP, Framingham risk calculated, BMI, waist circumference, smoking, physical activity, nutritionb

Non-randomized trials with controlled group

 Fullard, 1987

UK [53]

Patients aged 35–64 yearsa

CVRs

Primary care practice

Multifaceted approach (practice facilitator with a practice prevention nurse) vs. usual care

Weight, BP, and smoking history

 Franks, 1991

USA [62]

Patients aged ≥18 yearsa

cholesterol

Primary care practice

Financial incentives:

Free vs. usual care (paid)

Cholesterol

 Christensen, 1995

Denmark [59]

Men aged 40-49

CVRs

Primary care practice

Financial incentives:

Free vs. paid

Overall CVRS

 Toth-Pal, 2004

Sweden [54]

Adults aged ≥70 years

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

Physician reminder (computer-based) vs. usual care

BP, diabetes

 Frank, 2004

Australia [55]

Eligible adults fulfilled screeninga

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

Physician reminder (computer-based) vs. usual care

Weight, smoking status, BP, diabetes, lipid

 Marshall, 2008

UK [61]

patients aged 35–74 years identified as probable high-risk

CVRs

Primary care practice

Dedicated personnel (project nurse) vs. usual care

Overall CVRs

Pre- and Post- studies

 Vincent, 1995

USA [64]

Adult populationa

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

multifaceted approach: computer generated worksheet with a reminder on health maintenance procedure, periodic physician performance report, patients reminder (letter invitation)

Cholesterol

 Bailie, 2003

Australia [56]

≥50 years (majority indigenous)

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

multifaceted approach: clinical guidelines, computerised reminder systems, audit and feedback

Weight, BP, waistcircumference, BMI, glucose

 Sinclair, 2006

New Zealand [63]

Adults eligible for cardiovascular risk screeninga

CVRs

Primary care practice

Multifaceted approach:

1) practice management software enhancement (alert to identify eligible patients for screening, electronic cardiovascular risk assessment tool)

2) CME for the clinical champion who oversee the project

3) Provision of relevant reporting and feedback

4) Eligible patients: letter invitation

Completed cardiovascular risk screen (5-year absolute cardiovascular risk)

 wee, 2013

Singapore [33]

Adults aged ≥40 years

CVRs

community

Multifaceted approach: free screening and convenient screening at housing estate

BP, fasting blood glucose and lipid

 Butala, 2013

USA [57]

adultsa

Multiple screening

Primary care practice

Physician reminders (paper-based notes for recommended preventive services)

Lipid and glucose

  1. BP blood pressure, CVRS uptake for cardiovascular risk factors as a whole
  2. amixed population which consisted of those with known and unknown CVD
  3. bresults provided by the corresponding author