Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariable models for each, GP and PA

From: Advising vaccinations for the elderly: a cross-sectional survey on differences between general practitioners and physician assistants in Germany

  

GP (n = 774)

PA that are responsible for vaccination advices in their surgery (n = 456)

 

Variables

OR (95 % CI)

p-value

OR (95 % CI)

p-value

SD

Practice in Western part of Germany (Ref: East)

2.81 (1.59–4.97)

<0.001

n.s.

 

Amount of patients of ≥60 year less than 50 % (Ref: ≥50 %)

n.s.

 

2.19 (1.20–4.00)

0.011

Attitudes

Trusts in official recommendations

  

n.s.

 

Ref: Yes

1 (Ref)

   

Neutral

3.61 (1.56–8.32)

0.003

  

No

19.30 (2.28–163.24)

0.007

  

Likes to counsel about vaccinations

  

n.s.

 

Ref: Yes

1 (Ref)

   

Neutral

2.94 (1.56–5.54)

0.001

  

No

1.02 (0.24–4.27)

0.976

  

Benefit of officially recommended pneumococcal vaccine exceeds its potential harms

  

n.s.

 

Ref: Yes

1 (Ref)

   

Neutral

1.85 (0.99–3.44)

0.054

  

No

3.26 (1.30–8.14)

0.012

  

Regarding vaccinations, patients should be informed by:

    

General Practitioner (Ref: No)

0.31 (0.10–0.94)

0.038

n.s.

 

Public authorities (Ref: No)

n.s.

.

0.43 (0.21–0.90)

0.026

P

Not counseling routinely at regular intervals (Ref: Yes)

2.86 (1.37–5.96)

   
  1. Statistically significant (defined as p < 0.05) associations with not advising at least one vaccination in the elderly despite STIKO-recommendations and no contraindication modelled separately for General Practitioner (GP) and Physician Assistant (PA); non-significant results (p ≥ 0.05) are added if any level of a variable yielded a significant result and are shown in italics
  2. Ref Reference, SD Socio-demographic and practice-characteristics, P Practice, n.s. not significant