Factors influencing general practitioners’ decisions about cardiovascular disease risk reassessment: findings from experimental and interview studies
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - D Islek|
|1 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Davorina Petek|
|5 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Shannon McKinn|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Shannon McKinn|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|5 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12875-016-0499-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.