This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Using theory to improve low back pain care in Australian Aboriginal primary care: a mixed method single cohort pilot study
© Lin et al. 2016
Received: 1 September 2015
Accepted: 24 March 2016
Published: 12 April 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annette Bishop|
|16 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deirdre Hurley Osing|
|15 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Ivan Lin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Ivan Lin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Ivan Lin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|12 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12875-016-0441-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.