Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of concordance on the average doctor-patient communication difference for South Asians, when compared to White British respondents (single-handed practices)

From: Does the availability of a South Asian language in practices improve reports of doctor-patient communication from South Asian patients? Cross sectional analysis of a national patient survey in English general practices

Ethnic group

Model 1:

Model 2:

Mean Score (0-100)

Average difference compared to White British respondents*

Average difference compared to White British respondents when a concordant language is:

Available at practice**

Not available at practice ‡

Indian

88.5

-1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)

-1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)

-2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)

Pakistani

88.5

-1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)

-0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)

-2.7 (-3.6, -1.9)

Bangladeshi

87.5

-2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)

4.5 (-1.0, 10.1)

-3.3 (-4.6, -2.0)

 

p < 0.0001 Æ—

Likelihood-ratio test: p = 0.0109 Æ—Æ—

  1. Both models were adjusted for age, gender, deprivation, self-rated health status, presence of a mental health condition, and a random effect for practice.
  2. Æ—Joint test of the differences of South Asians from White British.
  3. Æ—Æ—P-values relates to the Likelihood-ratio test (omnibus test) for whether the effect of ethnicity varies with language concordance (comparing model 2 with a model where the language-ethnicity concordance effect was constrained to be constant across the three ethnic groups).
  4. *There was no evidence (p = 0.19) to suggest that these adjusted mean scores varied across the three ethnic groups (post-hoc Wald test).
  5. **There was evidence (p = 0.0402) to suggest that these adjusted mean scores varied across the three ethnic groups. In particular, the adjusted mean scores varied between Bangladeshi and Indian ethnic group (p = 0.0368). However, adjusted differences between Pakistani and Indian and between Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic groups were not significant (p = 0.10 for both) (post-hoc Wald tests).
  6. ‡ There was no evidence (p = 0.19) to suggest that these adjusted mean scores varied across the three ethnic groups (post-hoc Wald test).