Skip to main content

Table 3 Illness beliefs, fatalistic beliefs, social networks

From: Illness beliefs and the sociocultural context of diabetes self-management in British South Asians: a mixed methods study

BIPQ items

Consequences

Timeline

Personal control

Treatment beliefs

Identity

Concern

Understanding

Emotional distress

Fatalism 1

Fatalism 2

Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient

Total number of conditions

.341**

.126

-.027

-.066

.122

.010

.030

.076

-.009

.143

No of supportive females

-.005

-.080

-.066

-.249

-.057

-.366*

.047

-.183

.002

-.259

Frequency of contact

-.193

-.146

.149

-.220

-.264

-.437**

.009

-.352**

-.212

-.309

Emotional work

-.171

.153

.241

.051

-.107

-.599**

.306#

-.465**

-.022

-.166

Illness work

.002

.238

-.183

-.209

-.010

-.358*

.146

-.195

-.278

-.300

Size of support network

-.276

-.088

.165

-.139

-.239

-.470**

.060

-.373*

-.258

-.298

Proximate children

.311

.232

.002

-.249

.099

-.055

-.006

.212

-.205

-.193

Types of relationships

-.150

-.215

-.035

.232

-.195

-.022

-.128

-.198

-.133

-.294##

  1. *Significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
  2. **Significant at 0.01 level (two-tailed).
  3. # r = .368 (p < 0.05) ## r = −.358 (p < 0.05) became significant after removal of outlier(s).