Skip to main content

Table 1 Profile of the study variables (n = 100)

From: Physicians' communication skills with patients and legal liability in decided medical malpractice litigation cases in Japan

 

Items

Mean ± SD (n) or number of cases (%)

 

Patient characteristics

Age (years)

 

40.41 ± 19.72 (54)

 

Sex

Male

35 (35.0)

  

Female

65 (65.0)

 

Type of disease

Treatment is elective/not urgently necessary

16 (16.0)

  

Othera

84 (84.0)

 

Severity of injury

Death

43 (43.0)

  

Otherb

57 (57.0)

Physician characteristics

Number of doctors who explained

One

73 (73.0)

  

Two or more

27 (27.0)

 

Department where patients were treated

Surgical system

34 (34.0)

  

Otherc

66 (66.0)

 

Type of medical facility

Clinic

27 (27.0)

  

Hospital

73 (73.0)

Manner of doctor's explanation

Purpose of explanation

Explanation to obtain patient's consent

80 (80.0)

  

Otherd

20 (20.0)

 

Timing of doctor's explanation

Prior to treatment or surgery

71 (70.0)

  

After treatment or surgery

10 (10.0)

  

No explanation

19 (20.0)

 

Those who received doctor's explanation

Patient only

36 (36.0)

  

Patient and family/family only

45 (45.0)

  

No explanation

19 (19.0)

 

Manner of doctor's explanation to patient

Oral only

44 (44.0)

  

Oral and other methods

18 (18.0)

  

No explanation/no explanation to patient

38 (38.0)

 

Manner of doctor's explanation to family

Oral only

36 (36.0)

  

Oral and other methods

6 (6.0)

  

No explanation/no explanation to family

58 (58.0)

 

Level of doctor's explanation to patient

Relevant and specific

20 (20.0)

  

Not sufficiently relevant or specific

40 (40.0)

  

Unknown/no explanation/no explanation to patient

40 (40.0)

 

Level of doctor's explanation to family

Relevant and specific

14 (14.0)

  

Not sufficiently relevant or specific

27 (27.0)

  

Unknown/no explanation/no explanation to family

59 (59.0)

 

Place of doctor's explanation

Inpatient ward

55 (55.0)

  

Outpatient clinic/other

45 (45.0)

 

Content of doctor's explanation

Related to surgery

37 (37.0)

  

Othere

63 (63.0)

Litigation

Mean length of litigation (years)

 

7.62 ± 4.41 (65)

 

Legal basis of plaintiff's claim

Tort law only

30 (30.0)

  

Tort law and contract law/contract law only

69 (69.0)

  

Otherf

1 (1.0)

 

Introduction of medical expert witness

Yes

34 (34.0)

  

No

66 (66.0)

 

Issue in litigation

Presence of doctor's explanation

19 (19.0)

  

Insufficient/incorrect doctor's explanation

81 (81.0)

 

Acknowledgement of doctor's fault by court decision

Yes

35 (35.0)

  

No

62 (62.0)

  

Unknown

3 (3.0)

 

Acknowledgement of physician liability by court decision

Yes

65(65.0)

  

No

35(35.0)

  1. a: "Other" includes "treatment is urgently necessary" and "other". b: "Other" includes temporary or permanent injury. c: "Other" includes internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, dermatology, dentistry, urology, and others. d: "Other" includes explanation about medical treatment guidance, and explanation about reasons of negative outcomes. e: "Other" includes explanations about medical treatment and medical testing. f: "Other" includes Constitutional rights.