Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The accuracy of the MMSE in detecting cognitive impairment when administered by general practitioners: A prospective observational study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Aug 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hein van Hout
11 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barton Palmer
17 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Howard Fillit
25 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Patrizio Pezzotti
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Howard Fillit
19 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barton Palmer
7 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hein van Hout
31 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Patrizio Pezzotti
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Patrizio Pezzotti
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Patrizio Pezzotti
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hein van Hout
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
13 May 2008 Editorially accepted
13 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-9-29

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement