From: Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence
 | Step 1: health status of family members | Step 2: health status of family members + circumstances | Step 3: health status of family members + circumstances + socialisation conditions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Odds ratio | Confidence interval | Odds ratio | Confidence interval | Odds Ratio | Confidence interval |
Health status | ||||||
Chronic disease in the family (no = ref) | 0.12** | 0.09–0.14 | 0.10** | 0.08–0.14 | 0.10** | 0.08–0.13 |
Family score self-reported health (higher score = more members reported bad health) | 0.35** | 0.28–0.45 | 0.44** | 0.34–0.56 | 0.47** | 0.37–0.61 |
Family circumstances | ||||||
Private insurance (social = reference) |  |  | 2.36** | 1.85–3.01 | 2.18** | 1.71–2.79 |
Educational level mother (low = ref) |  |  | 1.28 | 0.79–2.08 | 0.88 | 0.54–1.45 |
Educational level father (low = ref) |  |  | 1.87* | 1.08–3.23 | 1.60 | 0.92–2.78 |
Number of children |  |  | 2.25** | 1.99–2.53 | 2.27** | 2.01–2.56 |
Paid employment mother (no = ref) |  |  | 1.02 | 0.80–1.30 | 0.97 | 0.76–1.23 |
Indicators for socialisation | ||||||
Father or mother paid employment in health care sector (not = ref) |  |  |  |  | 2.38** | 1.75–3.24 |
Both parents western cultural background (one or both non-western = ref) |  |  |  |  | 2.51** | 1.54–4.10 |
Nagelkerke R2 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.42 | |||
Percentage correct | 86.1 | 88.6 | 88.6 |