Skip to main content

Table 4 Conditional Odds Ratios for styles of decision-making preferred by physicians (excluding perceived role)

From: Clinical decision-making: physicians' preferences and experiences

Physician characteristics

Paternalism vs. Shared decision-making*

Consumerism vs. Shared decision-making.**

 

COR (95% CI)

COR (95% CI)

Age

  

   28 – 49

1.00

1.00

   50+

2.09 (1.41 – 3.11)

1.11 (0.72 – 1.71)

Country of training

  

   U.S.

1.00

1.00

   Overseas

2.37 (1.34 – 4.19)

0.98 (0.45 – 2.16)

Respondent's type of medical specialty 1

  

   Primary Care

1.00

1.00

   Medical Specialty

1.32 (0.84 – 2.07)

1.66 (0.97 – 2.87)

   Surgical Specialty

0.74 (0.43 – 1.29)

2.56 (1.51 – 4.34)

Percentage of patients from minority backgrounds

  

   40% or less

1.00

1.00

   > 40%

1.53 (0.96 – 2.45)

1.10 (0.64 – 1.89)

Physician perceptions of frequency of encouraging patients to look for information

  

   Often/Sometimes

1.00

1.00

   Hardly ever/Never

2.05 (1.33 – 3.17)

0.96 (0.57 – 1.61)

Physician perceptions of frequency of having enough time with patients in visits

  

   Often/Sometimes

1.00

1.00

   Hardly ever/Never

1.81 (1.03 – 3.18)

1.54 (0.84 – 2.85)

  1. * A Conditional Odds Ratio of > 1 means that physicians in this category had a greater likelihood of preferring paternalism compared to shared decision-making than the referent group.
  2. ** A Conditional Odds Ratio of > 1 means that physicians in this category had a greater likelihood of preferring consumerism compared to shared decision-making than the referent group.
  3. 1Physicians in surgical specialties were less likely than physicians in medical specialties to prefer paternalism compared to shared decision-making (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.33 – 0.97), but no more likely to prefer consumerism compared to shared decision-making (OR 1.54; 95% CI 0.94 – 2.51).