Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean increase in screening by practice characteristic and intervention choice

From: A practice-centered intervention to increase screening for domestic violence in primary care practices

Practice Characteristics

Number of practices

Mean change in screening after intervention (SD)

Practice Type

  

   Internal Medicine

4

13% (7%)

   Family Medicine

8

8% (7%)

   Obstetric/Gynecology

3

10% (11%)

   Academic

5

13% (6%)

   Community

10

8% (8%)

Number of providers at practice

  

   1–3

3

7% (13%)

   4–10

6

6% (4%)

   11 or more

6

15% (5%)

Number of DVRPs attending initial training

  

   1

2

9% (15%)

   2

13

10% (7%)

Number of DVRPs attending mid-project training

  

   0

2

0% (2%)

   1

6

11% (4%)

   2

7

11% (9%)

Number of original DVRPs present in practice at end of study

  

   0

5

11% (8%)

   1

4

7% (5%)

   2

6

10% (9%)

Screening questionnaire used

  

   SAFE Questions [20]

7

9% (7%)

   Massachusetts Seminars Series on Domestic Violence [19]

4

11% (9%)

   Partner Violence Screen [21]

2

13% (9%)

   HITS [22]

2

5% (9%)

Person designated at practice to screen

  

   Nurse Staff

4

1% (2%)

   Providers

9

12% (6%)

   Both

2

16% (8%)

Patients to be routinely screened

  

   Women over age 18

4

10% (5%)

   All women

4

12% (10%)

   Men and Women over age 18

5

9% (8%)

   All patients

2

6% (10%)

Frequency of screening

  

   Once a year

12

10% (7%)

   At every visit

3

10% (10%)

Baseline screening rate

  

   <8%

3

4% (3%)

   8–10%

4

11% (7%)

   11–19%

4

11% (10%)

   >20%

4

11% (9%)