Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katharine Bradley |
24 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Vinson |
31 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Anderson |
8 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrich John |
8 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Proude |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Proude |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrich John |
20 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Vinson |
29 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Katharine Bradley |
13 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Proude |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Proude |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
26 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Proude |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
26 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
7 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Proude |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
7 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
14 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-7-17 |
You can find further information about peer review here.