Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Patients' views on outcome following head injury: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Jan 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - Paul Graham Morris
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bill McKinlay
14 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher McKevitt
21 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Tennant
23 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Paul Graham Morris
Resubmission - Version 3
23 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Paul Graham Morris
Resubmission - Version 4
23 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Jul 2005 Author responded Author comments - Paul Graham Morris
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Jul 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Jul 2005 Editorially accepted
27 Jul 2005 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-6-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement