Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect estimates (odds ratios/beta and 95% confidence intervals) of the association between the count of co-located non-physician disciplines and outcomes reflecting specialized chronic care management

From: Under the same roof: co-location of practitioners within primary care is associated with specialized chronic care management

Independent variables Unadjusted +Practice size and demographics + Country
  Odds ratios (95% CI)
Disease management programs    N = 317
Chronic heart failure 1.09 (0.96–1.25) 1.08 (0.95–1.24) 1.08 (0.95–1.24)
Asthma 1.18 (1.03–1.34) 1.17 (1.03–1.34) 1.17 (1.03–1.34)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1.20 (1.06–1.36) 1.19 (1.05–1.36) 1.19 (1.05–1.36)
Diabetes 1.41 (1.21–1.63) 1.40 (1.20–1.63) 1.40 (1.20–1.63)
Special sessions/clinics    N = 325
Diabetes 1.41 (1.23–1.61) 1.42 (1.24–1.62) 1.43 (1.25–1.65)
Hypertension 1.16 (1.00–1.34) 1.19 (1.03–1.38) 1.20 (1.03–1.39)
Elderly 1.19 (1.03–1.37) 1.21 (1.05–1.40) 1.22 (1.05–1.42)
    N = 294
High level of nurse provision 1.19 (1.03–1.39) 1.19(1.03–1.39) 1.39 (1.16–1.66)
  Beta (95% CI)   N = 330
Equipment score 0.64 (0.43, 0.86) 0.65 (0.43, 0.87) 0.69 (0.55, 0.83)
\