Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The views of general practitioners and practice nurses towards the barriers and facilitators of proactive, internet-based chlamydia screening for reaching young heterosexual men

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Mar 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Karen Lorimer
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - SAMANTHA BRACEBRIDGE
2 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elaine OConnell Francischetto
12 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jade Bilardi
13 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsey Kettinger
12 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Karen Lorimer
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Karen Lorimer
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Jun 2014 Editorially accepted
27 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-15-127

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement