Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Identifying patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms in electronic medical records in primary care: a validation study

  • Madelon den Boeft1Email author,
  • Johannes C van der Wouden1,
  • Trudie R Rydell-Lexmond2,
  • Niek J de Wit2,
  • Henriëtte E van der Horst1 and
  • Mattijs E Numans1, 2, 3
BMC Family Practice201415:109

Received: 17 February 2014

Accepted: 28 May 2014

Published: 5 June 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
17 Feb 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Morriss
15 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kees van Boven
22 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Madelon den Boeft
Resubmission - Version 2
22 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 May 2014 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-15-109

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center
Department of General Practices, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht
Department of Public Health and Primary Care LUMC