Skip to main content

Table 2 Multilevel logistic regression analysis of patient and practice factors on received advice for prevention of CVD in the sample of younger people (regression coefficient above; statistical significance below in each cell)

From: Do family physicians advise younger people on cardiovascular disease prevention? A cross-sectional study from Slovenia

 

Smoking

Weight

Physical activity

Cholesterol

Lifestyle

Children lifestyle

Written info

N= 478

N=775

N=779

N=770

N=777

N=501

N=774

intercept

−3.89

-3.52

-3.45

-9.69

-3.12

-20.56

-3.32

0.16

0.17

0.12

0.00

0.22

0.00

0.29

Gender (female)

0.36

-0.07

0.07

-0.01

-0.20

0.14

0.23

0.11

0.68

0.67

0.98

0.26

0.60

0.27

age

-0.01

0.01

0.00

-0.01

0.01

-0.06

-0.02

0.75

0.29

0.89

0.70

0.21

0.01

0.19

Male 35-45 years

1.42

1.17

0.81

-1.08

-0.04

1.04

-0.36

0.05

0.05

0.14

0.23

0.95

0.66

0.05

education

-0.03

0.08

0.04

0.27

-0.15

-0.06

-0.20

0.87

0.54

0.77

0.09

0.25

0.74

0.09

Employment (not employed)

0.14

0.05

-0.07

0.46

0.34

-0.10

0.36

0.65

0.85

0.76

0.10

0.17

0.81

0.10

Marital status (not married) 1

'0.06

'0.01

0.00

0.09

-0.11

-0.56

-0.15

0.82

0.97

0.99

0.71

0.58

0.07

0.51

Self assessment of health 2

-0.26

-0.08

0.00

-0.06

0.14

0.11

0.08

0.03

0.36

0.96

0.60

0.12

0.47

0.47

BMI 3

0.03

0.01

0.00

0.04

-0.01

0.06

0.03

0.14

0.53

0.99

0.03

0.47

0.03

0.15

Hypertension 4

0.16

0.20

-0.19

-0.08

0.32

0.37

0.66

0.67

0.50

0.50

0.82

0.27

0.38

0.04

Practice size (large)

-0.03

-0.04

0.01

0.06

0.33

0.04

0.00

0.93

0.89

0.97

0.87

0.33

0.94

1.00

Practice loca- tion (urban)

-0.04

-0.21

-0.13

0.92

-0.18

-0.02

0.41

0.91

0.60

0.71

0.04

0.66

0.96

0.42

Recall system CVD 5

-0.74

-0.93

-0.53

-0.76

-0.34

0.33

-0.60

0.14

0.05

0.22

0.16

0.49

0.61

0.32

E pt file 6

-0.48

-0.48

-0.75

-2.14

-1.29

-1.09

-0.92

0.27

0.26

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.06

0.09

Case finding methods 7

0.21

0.25

0.20

0.00

0.29

-1.19

0.84

0.73

0.67

0.70

1.00

0.62

0.15

0.29

Community resources 8

-0.06

-0.21

-0.07

-0.13

-0.07

-0.05

0.01

0.70

0.15

0.58

0.42

0.63

0.82

0.96

Education organisation 9

-0.03

0.10

0.22

0.47

0.12

0.00

0.09

0.88

0.55

0.14

0.01

0.47

0.99

0.67

List size 10 linear

3.99

3.16

2.99

6.04

2.44

21.21

1.19

0.12

0.20

0.15

0.04

0.31

0.00

0.70

List size quadratic

-0.88

-0.72

-0.62

-1.19

-0.46

-5.30

-0.24

0.13

0.19

0.19

0.07

0.40

0.01

0.72

  1. Legend
  2. 1Marital status: 1= Married / cohabiting, 2= Single, Separated / divorced, Widowed.
  3. 2Self-assessment of health: How would you estimate your health status in general: 1= excellent, 2= very good and 3= good were aggregated to “good”, 4= fair and 5= poor to “poor”.
  4. 3Value of BMI (kg/m2).
  5. 4Yes/No answer of the patient if he/she has hypertension.
  6. 5Use of system for recall of people at risk for CVD.
  7. 6Computer-supported patient file system.
  8. 7If the practice uses case-finding methods to detect people with cardiovascular risk factors.
  9. 8Do practice physicians and nurses cooperate in local/community campaigns or actions?
  10. 9Education of providers: education of all nurses/GPs in the last five years on CVD, education of at least one nurse/GP on CVD in the last 15 months.
  11. 10Number of people on the patient list.