Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence of prescription of antidepressants for non-psychiatric conditions in primary care: an analysis of guidelines and systematic reviews
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - alain Mercier |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tobias Freund |
| 14 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - helene vaillant-roussel |
| 15 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Bereczki |
| 15 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - alain Mercier |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tobias Freund |
| 18 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - helene vaillant-roussel |
| 28 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Bereczki |
| 14 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - alain Mercier |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Apr 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 May 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-55 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
