Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Primary care clinicians’ attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Primary author (year)

Country

Type of study

Type of POCT

Participants’ experience of using POCTs

Number of participants

Type of primary care clinicians

Butler (2008) [16]

Wales (United Kingdom)

Semi-structured qualitative interviews

A test to distinguish bacterial from viral infections using a finger-prick blood test

No experience – participants discussed their perspectives on possible introduction of the POCT

40

GPs

Cals (2010) [17]

The Netherlands

Semi-structured qualitative interviews

C-reactive protein POCT for lower respiratory tract infection and other common infections

All participants had been using the POCT for nearly 3 years at the time of interview as part of a randomized trial

20

GPs

Cals (2009a) [18]

The Netherlands

Semi-structured qualitative interviews

C-reactive protein POCT to differentiate serious from self-limiting lower respiratory tract infection

10 participants had used the POCT for at least two years at the time of interview as part of a randomized trial; 10 participants had no experience

20

GPs

Gillam (1997) [19]

United Kingdom

Semi-structured interviews and a focus group

A range of POCTs including haematology (full blood count, platelets); chemical pathology (sodium, potassium, urea, creatine); glucose, cholesterol; bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase; creatine kinase

Participants worked in a health centre where POCTs were piloted; a nurse took blood samples using venipuncture, they were analysed onsite, and the results were made available to the GP at the end of surgery or immediately if requested

Unknown

GPs

Glover (2008) [20]

Australia

Group discussions + individual interviews

INR (international normalised ratio) fingerstick test for monitoring patients on warfarin

No experience (this is not stated explicitly but is assumed)

33 participants in total; unknown how many were GPs and nurses

Hospital pharmacists, specialists, nurses, GPs. We included only the attitudes of GPs and nurses in the review (nurses treated patients in their homes as well as in hospital)

Stone (2007) [21]

United Kingdom

Semi-structured qualitative interviews

HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin) finger-prick test for patients with type 2 diabetes

Participants took part in a pragmatic, open, randomized controlled trial, where they gave some patients usual care and others POCTs for 1 year

11

GPs, practice nurses

Wood (2011) [22]

Belgium, Hungary, Spain, Wales, Poland, Italy, England, Norway, The Netherlands

Semi-structured qualitative interviews

C-reactive protein POCT to aid management of acute cough/lower respiratory tract infection

Participants from Norway routinely used the POCT; participants from other countries had no experience

80

Primary care clinicians