Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A small unconditional non-financial incentive suggests an increase in survey response rates amongst older general practitioners (GPs): a randomised controlled trial study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Pit
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Pit
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Crouch
13 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan VanGeest
23 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Pit
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Pit
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Pit
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
29 Jul 2013 Editorially accepted
30 Jul 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-14-108

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement