Skip to main content

Table 4 Relation between continuity of care and medication adherence

From: Heart failure patients’ experiences with continuity of care and its relation to medication adherence: a cross-sectional study

 

Medication adherence

17 or less

18

19

20 (maximum)

Personal continuity in general practice (p < 0.01)

0 care providers

4 (2.6%)

5 (3.2%)

28 (17.9%)

119 (76.3%)

1 care provider

9 (12.0%)

6 (8.0%)

5 (6.7%)

55 (73.3%)

2 care providers

1 (2.4%)

5 (12.2%)

4 (9.8%)

31 (75.6%)

3 or more care providers

0 (0.0%)

4 (16.7%)

4 (16.7%)

16 (66.7%)

Team continuity in general practice (p = 0.04)

30

3 (3.0%)

4 (4.0%)

11 (11.1%)

81 (81.8%)

24-29

5 (5.3%)

8 (8.5%)

15 (16.0%)

66 (70.2%)

18-23

3 (9.7%)

6 (19.4%)

6 (19.4%)

16 (51.6%)

12-17

3 (17.6%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.9%)

13 (76.5%)

6-11

0 (0.0%)

2 (11.8%)

3 (17.6%)

12 (70.6%)

Cross-boundary continuity (p = 0.19)

20

2 (2.1%)

3 (3.1%)

14 (14.6%)

77 (80.2%)

16-19

3 (6.1%)

4 (8.2%)

10 (20.4%)

32 (65.3%)

12-15

1 (4.3%)

3 (13.0%)

2 (8.7%)

17 (73.9%)

8-11

0 (0.0%)

3 (25.0%)

1 (8.3%)

8 (66.7%)

4-7

1 (11.1%)

0 (0.0%)

1 (11.1%)

7 (77.8%)

  1. Medication adherence varied between 4 (minimum) and 20 (maximum). Because of the small number of patients scoring 17 or less, we grouped these patients together.