Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Study protocol: The registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jul 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Goode
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ilkka Kunnamo
23 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Goode
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ilkka Kunnamo
27 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Goode
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
4 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
6 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-13-50

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement