This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A qualitative study on healthcare professionals’ perceived barriers to insulin initiation in a multi-ethnic population
© Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 October 2011
Accepted: 2 April 2012
Published: 4 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Yew Kong Lee|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephanie Tierney|
|2 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Sunaert|
|31 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Yew Kong Lee|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephanie Tierney|
|18 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Sunaert|
|2 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Yew Kong Lee|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-13-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.