The effect of problem-based learning in patient education after an event of CORONARY heart disease – a randomised study in PRIMARY health care: design and methodology of the COR-PRIM study
© Kärner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 19 December 2011
Accepted: 15 November 2012
Published: 20 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janko Kersnik|
|23 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Smith|
|27 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Wilson|
|10 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anita Kärner|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Smith|
|1 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Wilson|
|5 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anita Kärner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anita Kärner|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-13-110|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.