This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
General practitioners’ views on the acceptability and applicability of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in multiple European countries: a qualitative study prior to a randomised trial
- Sibyl Anthierens†1,
- Sarah Tonkin-Crine†2Email author,
- Elaine Douglas3,
- Patricia Fernandez-Vandellos4,
- Jaroslaw Krawczyk5,
- Carl Llor6,
- Jochen WL Cals7,
- Nick A Francis8,
- Lucy Yardley9,
- Samuel Coenen1,
- Theo Verheij10,
- Herman Goossens11,
- Paul Little2 and
- the GRACE INTRO study team
© Anthierens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 June 2012
Accepted: 8 October 2012
Published: 11 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Tonkin-Crine|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Smailes|
|22 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cara Litvin|
|13 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Tonkin-Crine|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|11 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-13-101|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.