Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mariana Lazo |
| 27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David McLernon |
| 10 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Lilford |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mariana Lazo |
| 1 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David McLernon |
| 6 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Lilford |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Lilford |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 16 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Lilford |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 16 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Lilford |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.