Attribute | Summary of method |
---|---|
Clarity | • RAND Appropriateness Method ratings * |
Necessity | • RAND Appropriateness Method ratings * |
Acceptability | • Risks, issues, relative impact, and uncertainties (interviews with practice staff) |
Feasibility | • 'Technically feasiblility' in current family practice systems and whether supported by current methods of data extraction for QOF (data extraction in all family practice clinical systems) |
Reliability | • Reproducible in testing (data extraction: test-retest) |
Implementation | • Baseline and potential change in baseline;evidence of sensitivity to change (data extraction); |
 | • Exception reporting/gaming (interviews with practice staff); |
 | • Changes in practice organisation; potential barriers; workload (interviews with practice staff and workload diaries) |
 | • Unintended consequences (interviews with practice staff) |
Changes to any existing QOF indicators | • Summary of any suggested changes to existing QOF indicators as a result of piloted indicators |
Changes in wording of the indicator(s) | • Summary of any suggested changes to indicator wording |
Cost effectiveness | • Summary of evidence of cost effectiveness (cost-effectiveness modelling) |
Overall recommendation | 1) no major barriers/risks/issues/uncertainties |
 | 2) some barriers/risks/issues/uncertainties but okay |
 | 3) major barriers/risks/issues/uncertainties preclude it |