Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of a Physical exercise programme (PEP) vs Care as usual (CAU) on social functioning and role functioning (SF 36 score) at 6 and 12 weeks vs Baseline, using Analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) *

From: Exercise therapy for Stress-related mental disorder, a randomised controlled trial in primary care

 

Social functioning

Role functioning

 

PEP

CAU

Difference (95% BI)

Effect size (95% BI)

PEP

CAU

Difference (95% BI)

Effect size (95% BI)

Baseline

47.4 (28.5)

48.3 (25.2)

  

21.0 (36.8)

23.4 (35.9)

  

6 weeks

57.8 (23.2)

63.4 (21.4)

  

36.7 (42.7)

49.8 (44.6)

  

ANCOVA

  

-5.4 (-13.8,3.1)

-0.02 (-0.52, 0.12)

  

-12.8 (-30.1,4.5)

-0.34(-0.80, 0.12)

12 weeks

60.1 (27.1)

69.9 (22.2)

  

37.4 (41.7)

62.3 (43.0)

  

ANCOVA

  

-9.5 (-18.6,-0.5)

-0.36 (-0.70, -0.02)

  

-24.4 (-41.1,-7.8)

-0.65 (-1.09, -0.21)

  1. * ANCOVA analysis of covariance; Values are means (SD) unless indicated otherwise. 95% BI 95%-confidence interval; Effect size is Cohen's d; PEP = physical exercise programme; CAU = care as usual.