Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prediction of persistent shoulder pain in general practice: Comparing clinical consensus from a Delphi procedure with a statistical scoring system

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Mar 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - stephen may
6 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tasha Stanton
11 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Beneciuk
30 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Vergouw
Resubmission - Version 2
30 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tasha Stanton
11 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Beneciuk
13 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - stephen may
23 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Vergouw
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
29 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Vergouw
Resubmission - Version 7
29 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
29 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Vergouw
Resubmission - Version 8
29 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
30 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
30 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-12-63

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement