Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippa Logan |
| 11 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan Greenwood |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Bray |
| 12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan Greenwood |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Bray |
| 2 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philippa Logan |
| 9 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan Greenwood |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan Greenwood |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nan Greenwood |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 23 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-57 |
You can find further information about peer review here.