Urine culture doubtful in determining etiology of diffuse symptoms among elderly individuals: a cross-sectional study of 32 nursing homes
© Sundvall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 October 2010
Accepted: 19 May 2011
Published: 19 May 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anders Baerheim|
|12 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Les Toop|
|27 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Pär-Daniel Sundvall|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Mar 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anders Baerheim|
|3 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Les Toop|
|12 May 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Pär-Daniel Sundvall|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 May 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 May 2011||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2011||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-12-36|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.