Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 4 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - michael kirby |
| 18 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Holt |
| 22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lidewij Henneman |
| 16 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - michael kirby |
| 4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lidewij Henneman |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Holt |
| 4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 27 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 27 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-15 |
You can find further information about peer review here.