Peer Review reports
From: General practitioners' experience and benefits from patient evaluations
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chang Shim |
| 28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong |
| 4 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrika Winblad |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 22 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong |
| 27 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chang Shim |
| 1 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrika Winblad |
| 28 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Hanne Heje |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Hanne Heje |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 20 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Hanne Heje |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 20 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-116 |
You can find further information about peer review here.