Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Does clinical examination aid in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in women? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Submission
26 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guido Schmiemann
19 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Stobberingh
12 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Medina-Bombardó
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guido Schmiemann
24 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon
29 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Stobberingh
25 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Medina-Bombardó
Resubmission - Version 5
25 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon
7 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Medina-Bombardó
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Medina-Bombardó
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
25 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - David Medina-Bombardó
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
10 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
10 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-12-111

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page