Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy

Original Submission
8 Jan 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrike Junius-Walker
23 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Lewis
21 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrike Junius-Walker
12 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Lewis
2 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrike Junius-Walker
27 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
6 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens
Resubmission - Version 7
6 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
8 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens
Resubmission - Version 9
8 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
15 Sep 2010 Editorially accepted
15 Sep 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-11-65

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page