Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 May 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell|
|3 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi|
|15 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Ploeg|
|9 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Siw Carlfjord|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi|
|27 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Ploeg|
|8 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Siw Carlfjord|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-11-60|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.