This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Knowledge of stroke risk factors among primary care patients with previous stroke or TIA: a questionnaire study
© Sloma et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 20 January 2010
Accepted: 15 June 2010
Published: 15 June 2010
Survivers of stroke or transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) are at risk of new vascular events. Our objective was to study primary health care patients with stroke/TIA regarding their knowledge about risk factors for having a new event of stroke/TIA, possible associations between patient characteristics and patients' knowledge about risk factors, and patients' knowledge about their preventive treatment for stroke/TIA.
A questionnaire was distributed to 240 patients with stroke/TIA diagnoses, and 182 patients (76%) responded. We asked 13 questions about diseases/conditions and lifestyle factors known to be risk factors and four questions regarding other diseases/conditions ("distractors"). The patients were also asked whether they considered each disease/condition to be one of their own. Additional questions concerned the patients' social and functional status and their drug use. The t-test was used for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables, and a regression model with variables influencing patient knowledge was created.
Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking were identified as risk factors by nearly 90% of patients, and atrial fibrillation and diabetes by less than 50%. Few patients considered the distractors as stroke/TIA risk factors (3-6%). Patients with a family history of cardiovascular disease, and patients diagnosed with carotid stenosis, atrial fibrillation or diabetes, knew these were stroke/TIA risk factors to a greater extent than patients without these conditions. Atrial fibrillation or a family history of cardiovascular disease was associated with better knowledge about risk factors, and higher age, cerebral haemorrhage and living alone with poorer knowledge. Only 56% of those taking anticoagulant drugs considered this as intended for prevention, while 48% of those taking platelet aggregation inhibitors thought this was for prevention.
Knowledge about hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking as risk factors was good, and patients who suffered from atrial fibrillation or carotid stenosis seemed to be well informed about these conditions as risk factors. However, the knowledge level was low regarding diabetes as a risk factor and regarding the use of anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors for stroke/TIA prevention. Better teaching strategies for stroke/TIA patients should be developed, with special attention focused on diabetic patients.
More than 30 000 patients suffer from stroke and 8 000 suffer from transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) in Sweden annually . Survivors of stroke or TIA remain at high risk of new vascular events [2–4]. Regardless of this fact, many reports have shown that secondary prevention after stroke or TIA is not satisfactory [5–7]. One of the reasons for unsatisfactory secondary prevention could be patients' lack of knowledge about risk factors for suffering from new events of stroke, which was suggested as a contributing factor to the lack of compliance with medical advice and treatment . A number of previous studies have assessed knowledge in the general population concerning stroke, its symptoms and risk factors. Most of those studies have demonstrated poor understanding of stroke risks and symptoms among people in general [9–12]. Other studies have shown that knowledge about stroke and stroke risk factors was poorest among groups at highest risk of suffering from stroke [13, 14]. Further, a few previous studies assessing stroke or TIA patients' knowledge about stroke risk factors have indicated poor knowledge about stroke, including knowledge about risk factors some months after stroke [7, 15], in rehabilitation patients [16, 17] or in an Indian context . However, the extent to which increased knowledge about stroke can be translated into improved patient recovery and adjustment remains unclear .
Our objective was to study primary health care patients who have already suffered from stroke or TIA (referred to in the following as stroke/TIA) regarding their knowledge about risk factors for having a new event of stroke/TIA, possible associations between patient characteristics and patients' knowledge about risk factors, and patients' knowledge about their own treatment for stroke/TIA prevention.
A cross-sectional postal questionnaire study.
Gustavsberg Primary Health Care Centre (GPHCC) is a large primary health care unit serving the majority of the population of the municipality of Värmdö, Sweden, with approximately 35 000 inhabitants within the catchment area. The population is growing and during the last ten years it has increased with 40 percent, which is the highest increase rate in Sweden during this period. Värmdö is situated in the Stockholm archipelago and the population is somewhat younger than the average Swedish population; only 10% of the inhabitants are 65 years or older (17% in Sweden). One third of the population has education from above the upper secondary school (34% in Sweden).
The study population consisted of patients who had the diagnosis of stroke or TIA registered in the medical records at GPHCC (ProfDoc™) by May 1, 2005. We used two different softwares (Xtractor™ and Rave™) to search for stroke and TIA diagnosis codes according to the Swedish primary health care version of ICD-10 : I61 (intracerebral haemorrhage), I63 (cerebral infarction), I64 (stroke, not specified as haemorrhage or infarction), I67 (other cerebrovascular diseases), I69 (sequelae of cerebrovascular disease), and G45 (transient cerebral ischaemic attacks). The diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage (I60), which could be considered as a stroke subtype, was excluded due to different aetiology and risk factors [1, 21]. Another source of patient identification was a separate stroke register created at GPHCC through previous searches in the medical records and through collaboration between the medical staff at GPHCC and Stockholm Söder Hospital's Stroke Care Unit. The hospital reported all patients with stroke/TIA living in Värmdö (based on postcode numbers) to GPHCC. The majority of patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were found by using both the medical records and the separate stroke register. In total, 383 patients were identified.
A questionnaire was used to assess the patients' knowledge about diseases and conditions established as important factors increasing the risk of having a new stroke/TIA. The questionnaire was designed especially for the purpose of this study. It was based on a literature review of previous studies concerning patients' knowledge about stroke/TIA and stroke/TIA risk factors [11, 12, 22, 23].
We tested the questionnaire in a pilot study with a sample of five persons who were not a part of the study population (staff members at GPHCC). A few changes in the wording of questions were made as a result of the pilot study.
Patients were asked to evaluate how 13 diseases/conditions, established as stroke/TIA risk factors, influenced the risk of having a new stroke/TIA [23, 24]. The risk factors were presented in the questionnaire in the following order: higher age, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, a family history of cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, overweight, regular physical exercise, excessive alcohol consumption, previous stroke/TIA, carotid stenosis, smoking and ischaemic heart disease. The questionnaire was designed as a series of questions about stroke/TIA risk factors with the same response alternatives. A common problem with this kind of questionnaire is that after being asked a series of similar questions, some people may give the same answer to each question without really considering it. To reduce this risk, four questions regarding medical diagnoses/conditions which are known not to be stroke/TIA risk factors ("distractors") were added: rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, thyroid disease and allergy. The distractors were placed at random in the questionnaire.
An example of a question was: "How do you think that diabetes influences the risk of having a new stroke/TIA?" Possible answers were: "it increases the risk", "it reduces the risk", "it does not influence the risk", "do not know". We considered "increases the risk" to be the correct answer for questions about stroke/TIA risk factors, except for the question about regular exercise habits, where "reduces the risk" was considered to be correct. The correct answer for the distractors was "does not influence the risk".
For all items except higher age and previous stroke/TIA, the patients were also asked if they regarded the disease/condition in the questionnaire as their own; for example, "Do you have diabetes?" with the following response alternatives: "yes", "no", "do not know". For questions concerning lifestyle factors (overweight, level of physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking) we asked the patients to add self-reported information to their answers about their weight and height (from which Body Mass Index, BMI was calculated), exercise habits, alcohol and tobacco use. Seven questions about the patients' social and functional status were also added. Finally the patients were asked to list all the drugs they were taking and to mark those which they considered to be prescribed for preventing new events of stroke/TIA.
The questionnaire also included an open-ended question, where the patients were asked to give some examples of other conditions or diseases that they thought could influence the risk of having a new stroke/TIA.
Background information about the patients
Data concerning age, sex, stroke/TIA diagnoses, and number of years since the first ever stroke/TIA event were available for all patients in the study population who returned the questionnaire and these were collected from the medical records during the preparatory phase of our study. All stroke/TIA patients living in GPHCC's catchment area had been invited annually to group meetings where patients and their relatives had an opportunity to get information about stroke/TIA risk factors and their treatment. The patients own risk factors were always discussed according to a checklist, which included blood pressure, blood lipids, blood glucose and lifestyle factors. Data about participation in these group meetings were also included as background data for patients in the study population.
The main outcome measure of the study was the extent to which patients could correctly identify the different stroke/TIA risk factors in the questionnaire. Only the answer "it increases the risk" was considered to be correct (except for the question about regular exercise habits, which was constructed in the opposite way: "How do you think that regular exercise influences the risk of having a new stroke or TIA?" and where the correct answer was "it reduces the risk").
We also calculated each patient's knowledge about stroke/TIA risk factors, defined as the number of correctly identified stroke/TIA risk factors in the questionnaire (range 0-13).
The patients' knowledge about their own treatment for stroke/TIA prevention was assessed by reviewing the patients' ability to mark, in their self-reported lists, the drugs which they thought were prescribed to prevent new events of stroke or TIA.
In the analysis of differences between patient groups (for example, between responders and non responders, between genders, etc.), we used the t-test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. For continuous variables, means ± standard deviation (SD) are presented.
For analysis of the relation between patients' knowledge about stroke/TIA risk factors and other variables, an ordered logistic regression analysis was performed. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were first calculated between the outcome variable, described as the number of correctly identified stroke/TIA risk factors in the questionnaire for each patient, and each one of the other variables (age, sex, stroke/TIA related diagnoses, lifestyle factors, participating in stroke group activities, educational level and information about social and functional status). Four variables were selected (age, heredity for stroke/TIA, occurrence of atrial fibrillation and diagnosis of cerebral haemorrhage) for which p-values for the Spearman rank correlation were significant (p < 0.05).
The dependent variable (the number of correctly identified risk factors) was then categorized for the purpose of statistical analysis. We defined "good" and "poor" knowledge of stroke/TIA risk factors according to the distribution of percentiles of correct answers. This resulted in cut-off points of less than 8 correct answers (below the 25% percentile), which was categorized as poor knowledge (45 patients); and more than 11 correct answers (above the 75% percentile), which was categorized as good knowledge (41 patients). The group with an intermediate number of correct answers (8-11) was categorized as having "moderate" knowledge (96 patients).
The model was adjusted by stepwise inclusion of the remaining independent variables into the model and evaluating how this influenced the variables within the model. Finally, a regression model with five variables was created (age, heredity for stroke/TIA, occurrence of atrial fibrillation, diagnosis of cerebral haemorrhage and living alone; the model is presented as adjusted for age). Statistical analyses were performed using STATA, version 9.2.
The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in Stockholm, (file 2005/1445-31/4).
After one written reminder, 182 questionnaires (75.8% of a total 240) were returned.
For the patients who did not return the questionnaires (n = 58), we analysed available data about age, sex, time since the first stroke/TIA event, and participation in group meetings for stroke/TIA patients at GPHCC. The response rate was higher among women (83.7%) than among men (70.4%), p = 0.018. Responding women were younger (mean age 71.5 years) than non responding women (78.3 years), p = 0.021. Among responders, 50.5% had participated in group meetings for stroke/TIA patients at GPHCC compared with 20.7% of non responders (p < 0.001). Other observed differences between responders and non responders were not statistically significant.
Stroke/TIA diagnoses according to medical records and lifestyle and social factors according to self-reported data.
Number of patients (%)
n = 182
Stroke related diagnoses (ICD-10 codes)
Intracerebral haemorrhage (I61)
Cerebral infarction (I63)
Stroke, not specified as haemorrhage or infarction (I64)
Transient ischaemic attacs, TIA (G45)
Overweight (Body Mass Index, BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2
Excessive alcohol consumption 1)
Regular physical activity 2)
Born in Sweden
Living alone (12 men, 26 women; p = 0.009)**
Completed upper secondary education or a higher educational level (37 men, 15 women; p = 0.036)*
Needing help with personal hygiene (such as going to the toilet, getting dressed and undressed)
Needing at least one technical aid for walking/transportation: cane (27 (14.8); walker 22 (12.1); crutch 17 (9.3); wheelchair 11 (6.0)
Lifestyle factors are presented in Table 1. Statistically significant differences between sexes were observed for BMI (women 24.7 ± 4.4 kg/m2, men 27.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2, p < 0.001) and alcohol consumption (12 men, 12.0%, and 3 women, 3.7%, reported drinking more than two standard drinks daily, p = 0.036). Social factors are also listed in Table 1. A higher proportion of the women were living alone and a higher proportion of men had a high educational level. The majority of the patients (n = 145, 79.7%) reported being able to fill in the questionnaire without any help from other persons. Ninety-two patients in the study population (50.5%) had participated in group meetings for stroke/TIA patients at GPHCC. More than half of those who had participated (52.2%) had done so more than once.
Patients' identification of stroke/TIA risk factors
Proportion (%) of patients considering diseases/conditions to be or not to be stroke/TIA risk factors.
Answers in the questionnaire
n = 182
Increases the risk
Reduces the risk
No influence on risk
Do not know
Stroke/TIA risk factors
Ischaemic heart disease
Excessive alcohol consumption
Family history of cardiovascular disease
Suffering previous stroke/TIA
Only a few patients considered medical conditions that were not stroke/TIA risk factors (distractors) as stroke/TIA risk factors (Table 2). The most common answer was "do not know", although there was a group of patients who knew that these conditions did not affect the risk of having a new event of stroke/TIA (28.0% for osteoporosis, 21.4% for allergy, 14.3% for rheumatoid arthritis and 12.6% for thyroid disease). Knowledge about distractors was not correlated with knowledge about known risk factors (Sperman's rho 0.06).
Half of the patients in the study population had attended group meetings for stroke/TIA patients at GPHCC at least once. However, we did not find that having attended group meetings influenced patients' knowledge about stroke/TIA risk factors (data not shown).
Associations between patient characteristics and patients' knowledge about risk factors
Different risk perceptions among patients considering the disease/condition as their own.
Patients considering the disease/condition as their own/not their own
Patients who alsoidentified the disease/condition as a risk factor
n = 182 (%)
n = first column (%)
Not own factor
46 (86.8 )
Not own factor
Not own factor
No regular exercise
Not own factor
Not own factor
Ischaemic heart disease
Not own factor
Excessive alcohol consumption
Not own factor
Family history of cardiovasc. disease
Not own factor
Not own factor
Not own factor
Not own factor
Patients who reported that they had a family history of cardiovascular disease, carotid stenosis, atrial fibrillation or diabetes had statistically significant better knowledge about the fact that this disease/condition was a stroke/TIA risk factor compared to patients who reported that they did not suffer from these conditions (Table 3).
On the other hand, patients who reported hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, lack of regular physical activity, overweight, excessive alcohol consumption or ischaemic heart disease as their own risk factors did not have statistically significant better knowledge about the fact that these diseases/conditions were stroke/TIA risk factors compared to patients who reported that they did not have these diseases/conditions. Older patients (75 years or older) did not have significantly better knowledge about age being a stroke/TIA risk factor as compared to younger patients (data not shown).
When asked to name other conditions or diseases that could increase the risk of having a new stroke/TIA, 27 patients (14.8%) mentioned stress. Other conditions mentioned occasionally included diet, family troubles, lifting heavy things, blood diseases (coagulation disorders), disturbed blood circulation in the legs, surgery, unhealthy lifestyle, sleep apnea syndrome, estrogens, caeliac disease.
Model of factors influencing the knowledge about stroke/TIA risk factors (adjusted for age).
Family history of cardiovascular disease
1.040 - 3.367
1.267 - 6.285
Diagnosis of cerebral haemorrhage
0.129 - 0.783
0.241 - 0.997
Knowledge about treatment for reducing the risk of having a new stroke/TIA
When asked to list their drugs and to mark those that they thought were intended to prevent recurrent stroke/TIA events, 165 of the 182 patients (90.7%) reported taking drugs, 5 (2.7%) reported not taking any drugs, and 12 (6.6%) did not answer the question. Nearly half of the 165 patients who listed their drugs (86; 47.2%) did not mark any of them as preventive.
Patients' recognition of risk factor treatment.
Number of patients who reported treatment
n = 182 (%)
Number of those who marked the treatment as intended for stroke/TIA prevention
n = first column (%)
Platelet aggregation inhibitors
Our study showed that stroke/TIA patients' knowledge varied concerning risk factors for having a new stroke/TIA. Some diseases/conditions (hypertension and hyperlipidemia) and lifestyle related factors (smoking, absence of regular exercise, overweight) seemed to be quite well known stroke/TIA risk factors, both generally among all patients and among the patients who considered those risk factors as their own. Specific diseases such as carotid stenosis, atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus were identified as risk factors to a lesser extent. Patients who knew that they suffered from atrial fibrillation and carotid stenosis could, however, identify those conditions as stroke/TIA risk factors in more than 90% of cases. Kraywinkel et al also reported better knowledge of a specific risk factor among those affected by it .
Patients with atrial fibrillation seemed to have significantly better knowledge of stroke/TIA risk factors compared to the whole group of patients. This could be the result of more frequent contacts with medical care (because of regular monitoring of treatment with warfarin, for example), or a particular interest in health issues, since these patients had probably received more detailed information as the drugs they were taking have substantial risks of side effects.
Diabetes mellitus had the lowest identification rate. Furthermore, among patients who considered diabetes as a disease of their own, only 72.2% could identify diabetes as a stroke/TIA risk factor. Poor understanding of the fact that diabetes could be a stroke/TIA risk factor was observed previously by Kraywinkel et al in a study conducted among people without prior stroke/TIA events  and also in a study by Maasland et al . In a study conducted in India, diabetes was among the best known stroke/TIA risk factors, at the same level as hypertension, smoking and excessive intake of alcohol, but the general level of knowledge was much lower than in our study . In the prevention and education of the diabetic patients, most focus tend to be on cardiovascular complications and complications from the eyes and the feet, and cerebrovascular complications may receive less attention.
To our surprise, only 62% of the patients could identify the fact that a previous event of stroke/TIA was a factor that increased the risk of having a new stroke/TIA.
Patients in our study who had a registered diagnosis of cerebral haemorrhage had a lower level of knowledge about stroke/TIA risk factors, which could correspond to the generally worse clinical condition (including cognitive impairment) that follows a haemorrhagic stroke as compared to an ischaemic stroke . Occasionally, a diagnosis of cerebral haemorrhage has also been used as an exclusion criteria when studying knowledge about risk factors .
In some studies, a number of sociodemographic factors have been found to influence patients' knowledge about stroke/TIA risk factors; for example, older age, male sex, and lower educational level, and this is in line with our results . We found that being 75 years or older, or living alone, were factors that negatively influenced knowledge of stroke/TIA risk factors. Higher age was found to have a negative effect in some studies [11, 14, 15] but no effect in others . Lower educational level was found to have a negative effect in a a study conducted in India , but not in some other studies [15, 23].
The task of listing their drugs and marking those regarded as being prescribed to prevent new events of stroke/TIA seemed to be difficult, since less than half of the patients who listed their drugs marked any of them as intended to prevent stroke/TIA. Patients who are given anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors should be informed about the preventive effect of these drugs, and the fact that only 56.3% of those reporting the use of anticoagulants and 48.2% of those reporting the use of platelet aggregation inhibitors indicated that their purpose was preventive is worrying. The still lower proportions for patients using antihypertensive, antilipemic and hypoglycemic agents also indicate the importance of better patient education.
The fact that the patients who had attended the group meetings for stroke/TIA patients at GPHCC did not have better knowledge about risk factors than the rest of the group emphasizes the need for further studies regarding teaching strategies focusing on stroke/TIA patients.
There is a very strong tradition in Sweden and in the other Nordic countries to refer patients suspected of having suffered a stroke/TIA to hospital for Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. National, regional and local guidelines stress the importance of referring all patients with recent (less than a week) symptoms compatible with stroke/TIA directly to hospital for further investigations and evaluation . Recent Swedish studies show that only about five percent of first-ever stroke patients have not been in contact with hospital, and these comprise mainly patients living in nursing homes . It is thus a strength of this study that we are likely to have included nearly all first-ever stroke/TIA patients. The patients we might have failed to include could be nursing home patients with concomitant severe diseases, or patients who never saw a doctor for their stroke/TIA symptoms.
One limitation of this study could be that we chose to design the questionnaire especially for the purpose of the study, as we could not find any questionnaires in the literature that were suitable. The questionnaire included a large number of close-ended questions, which made it rather long (eight pages). However, close-ended questions could result in a higher percentage of answers as compared to the open-ended questions used in several previous studies . Although the response rate was rather good, the complexity and size of the questionnaire may have influenced it negatively. The fact that the risk factors were self reported makes misunderstandings possible. Another limitation is the small number of patients in some of the subgroups, for example patients with excessive alcohol consumption or carotid stenosis.
Our study shows that knowledge about hypertension, hyperlipidemia and smoking as risk factors for new events of stroke/TIA was good, and that patients who suffered from atrial fibrillation or carotid stenosis seemed to be well informed about these conditions as risk factors. However, the level of knowledge was low regarding diabetes as a risk factor, and about the use of anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors for stroke/TIA prevention. Patients who had attended the group meetings did not have better knowledge than non-attendants. It thus seems necessary to develop individual teaching strategies for stroke/TIA patients, taking each patient's background into account. Special attention should be focused on diabetic patients to ensure that they understand that stroke/TIA can also be a consequence of diabetes.
This work was supported by grants from the Stockholm County Council.
- Stegmayr B, Asplund K: Improved survival after stroke but unchanged risk of incidence. Lakartidningen. 2003, 100 (44): 3492-3498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson P, Rosewell M, James MA: How good is the management of vascular risk after stroke, transient ischaemic attack or carotid endarterectomy?. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007, 23 (2-3): 156-161. 10.1159/000097053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark TG, Murphy MF, Rothwell PM: Long term risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death in "low risk" patients with a non-recent transient ischaemic attack. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003, 74 (5): 577-580. 10.1136/jnnp.74.5.577.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sacco RL, Wolf PA, Kannel WB, McNamara PM: Survival and recurrence following stroke. The Framingham study. Stroke. 1982, 13 (3): 290-295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Norrving B, Terent A, Hulter-Asberg K, Wester PO, Asplund K: Large variations in the use of oral anticoagulants in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: a Swedish national perspective. J Intern Med. 2004, 255 (1): 22-32. 10.1046/j.0954-6820.2003.01253.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Girot M, Mackowiak-Cordoliani MA, Deplanque D, Henon H, Lucas C, Leys D: Secondary prevention after ischemic stroke. Evolution over time in practice. J Neurol. 2005, 252 (1): 14-20. 10.1007/s00415-005-0591-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Croquelois A, Bogousslavsky J: Risk awareness and knowledge of patients with stroke: results of a questionnaire survey 3 months after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006, 77 (6): 726-728. 10.1136/jnnp.2005.078618.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- O'Mahony PG, Rodgers H, Thomson RG, Dobson R, James OF: Satisfaction with information and advice received by stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 1997, 11 (1): 68-72. 10.1177/026921559701100110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blades LL, Oser CS, Dietrich DW, Okon NJ, Rodriguez DV, Burnett AM, Russell JA, Allen MJ, Fogle CC, Helgerson SD, et al: Rural community knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005, 2 (2): A14-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ferris A, Robertson RM, Fabunmi R, Mosca L: American Heart Association and American Stroke Association national survey of stroke risk awareness among women. Circulation. 2005, 111 (10): 1321-1326. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157745.46344.A1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kothari R, Sauerbeck L, Jauch E, Broderick J, Brott T, Khoury J, Liu T: Patients' awareness of stroke signs, symptoms, and risk factors. Stroke. 1997, 28 (10): 1871-1875.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pancioli AM, Broderick J, Kothari R, Brott T, Tuchfarber A, Miller R, Khoury J, Jauch E: Public perception of stroke warning signs and knowledge of potential risk factors. Jama. 1998, 279 (16): 1288-1292. 10.1001/jama.279.16.1288.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta A, Thomas P: General perception of stroke. Knowledge of stroke is lacking. Bmj. 2002, 325 (7360): 392-10.1136/bmj.325.7360.392/a.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Samsa GP, Cohen SJ, Goldstein LB, Bonito AJ, Duncan PW, Enarson C, DeFriese GH, Horner RD, Matchar DB: Knowledge of risk among patients at increased risk for stroke. Stroke. 1997, 28 (5): 916-921.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koenig KL, Whyte EM, Munin MC, O'Donnell L, Skidmore ER, Penrod LE, Lenze EJ: Stroke-related knowledge and health behaviors among poststroke patients in inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007, 88 (9): 1214-1216. 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clark MS, Smith DS: Knowledge of stroke in rehabilitation and community samples. Disabil Rehabil. 1998, 20 (3): 90-96. 10.3109/09638289809166061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein J, Shafqat S, Doherty D, Frates EP, Furie KL: Patient knowledge and expectations for functional recovery after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003, 82 (8): 591-596. 10.1097/00002060-200308000-00004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Das K, Mondal GP, Dutta AK, Mukherjee B, Mukherjee BB: Awareness of warning symptoms and risk factors of stroke in the general population and in survivors stroke. J Clin Neurosci. 2007, 14 (1): 12-16. 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.12.049.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forster A, Smith J, Young J, Knapp P, House A, Wright J: Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001, CD001919-3Google Scholar
- Socialstyrelsen: Klassifikation av sjukdomar och hälsoproblem 1997. Primärvård. Version KSH97-P. 1996Google Scholar
- Herrmann N, Black SE, Lawrence J, Szekely C, Szalai JP: The Sunnybrook Stroke Study: a prospective study of depressive symptoms and functional outcome. Stroke. 1998, 29 (3): 618-624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sug Yoon S, Heller RF, Levi C, Wiggers J, Fitzgerald PE: Knowledge of stroke risk factors, warning symptoms, and treatment among an Australian urban population. Stroke. 2001, 32 (8): 1926-1930.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kraywinkel K, Heidrich J, Heuschmann PU, Wagner M, Berger K: Stroke risk perception among participants of a stroke awareness campaign. BMC Public Health. 2007, 7: 39-10.1186/1471-2458-7-39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hacke W, Kaste M, Bogousslavsky J, Brainin M, Chamorro A, Lees K, Leys D, Kwiecinski H, Toni P, Langhorne P, et al: European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management-update 2003. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003, 16 (4): 311-337. 10.1159/000072554.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maasland L, Koudstaal PJ, Habbema JDF, Dippel DWJ: Knowledge and Understanding of Disease Process, Risk Factors and Treatment Modalities in Patients with a Recent TIA or Minor Ischemic Stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007, 23: 435-440. 10.1159/000101468.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Truelsen T, Bonita R: Advances in ischemic stroke epidemiology. Adv Neurol. 2003, 92: 1-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferro JM, Canhao P, Peralta R: Update on subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol. 2008, 255 (4): 465-479. 10.1007/s00415-008-0606-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nicol MB, Thrift AG: Knowledge of risk factors and warning signs of stroke. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2005, 1 (2): 137-147. 10.2147/vhrm.22.214.171.124085.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- VISS, Neurology, Stroke: Guidelines for Stockholm County Council (in Swedish). 2002, [http://www.viss.nu]Google Scholar
- Appelros P, Högerås N, Térent A: Case ascertainement in stroke studies: the risk of selection bias. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003, 107: 145-149. 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.02120.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/11/47/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.