Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Buntinx
28 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marjan van den Akker
24 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Nada Khan
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Nada Khan
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Nada Khan
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Nada Khan
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
5 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
5 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-11-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement