Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Discussing prognosis with older people with musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study in general practice

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amanda Williams
11 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Underwood
24 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Christian Mallen
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amanda Williams
17 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Underwood
17 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Christian Mallen
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Christian Mallen
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Christian Mallen
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
7 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
7 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-10-50

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement