Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Jul 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
31 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tom Blakeman |
7 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Furler |
15 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hilde Bastiaens |
27 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Harris |
6 Oct 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Furler |
21 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tom Blakeman |
2 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Harris |
14 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tom Blakeman |
12 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
19 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
19 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
27 Jan 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Jan 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-10-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.