Table 2 Association between PCPCM and each variable: the results of the multivariable linear regression analysis
From: Patient experiences in primary care do not differ according to rurality: a cross-sectional study
(n = 423) | Coefficient (95% CI, p-value) |
|---|---|
RIJ | − 0.002 (− 0.005–0.001, p = 0.22) |
Sex | |
Male | Reference |
Female | − 0.06 (− 0.22–0.09, p = 0.43) |
Age (year) | |
20–24 | Reference |
25–29 | −0.18 (− 0.60–0.23, p = 0.067) |
30–34 | 0.08 (− 0.40–0.55, p = 0.75) |
35–39 | − 0.14 (− 0.55–0.27, p = 0.50) |
40–44 | − 0.10 (− 0.50–0.31, p = 0.64) |
45–49 | − 0.08 (− 0.47–0.32, p = 0.83) |
50–54 | −0.014 (− 0.41–0.38, p = 0.95) |
55–59 | − 0.04 (− 0.45–0.36, p = 0.83) |
60–64 | −0.14 (− 0.54–0.25, p = 0.48) |
65–69 | −0.12 (− 0.53–0.29, p = 0.56) |
70–74 | −0.15 (− 0.57- -0.26, p = 0.46) |
Education | |
< High school | Reference |
High school | 0.48 (−0.07–1.02 p = 0.09) |
Junior college | 0.59 (0.04–.15, p = 0.036) |
≥ College | 0.42 (−0.14–0.96, p = 0.14) |
Annual household income (million JPY) | |
< 3.00 (≒27,000 US dollar) | Reference |
3.00–5.99 | 0.05 (−0.15–0.26, p = 0.62) |
6.00–8.99 | −0.05 (− 0.30–0.21, p = 0.72) |
9.00–11.99 | 0.15 (− 0.14–0.44, p = 0.30) |
12.00–14.99 | 0.25 (− 0.14–0.63, p = 0.21) |
≥ 15.00 | 0.38 (− 0.03–0.78, p = 0.07) |
Unknown | −0.08 (− 0.3–0.15, p = 0.51) |
Self-rated health status | |
Very poor | Reference |
Poor | 0.11 (−0.26–0.49, p = 0.55) |
Neutral | −0.11 (− 0.46–0.24, p = 0.53) |
Good | − 0.43 (− 0.78- -0.08, p = 0.016) |
Excellent | −0.62 (−1.01- -0.24, p = 0.002) |
Marital status | |
Married | Reference |
Not married | 0.66 (0.30–1.01, p < 0.001) |
Types of USC | |
Hospital | Reference |
Clinic | 0.06 (−0.09- -.21, p = 0.45) |
Number of chronic conditions | |
0 | Reference |
1 | 0.20 (0.04–0.37, p = 0.017) |
2 | 0.23 (0.01–0.49, p = 0.04) |
3 | 0.32 (−0.006–0.65, p = 0.054) |
4 | 0.41 (−0.04–0.86) |
5 | 1.27 (0.44–2.10, p = 0.003) |
6 | 0.03 (−1.39–1.44, p = 0.97) |
7 | 0.12 (−0.89–1.15, p = 0.81) |