Effect of audit and feedback with peer review on general practitioners’ prescribing and test ordering performance: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 23 July 2016
Accepted: 28 February 2017
Published: 13 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark V. Williams|
|4 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Justin Presseau|
|7 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noah Michael Ivers|
|30 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Muhammad Alotaibi|
|12 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Bowie|
|27 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sofia Eilat|
|18 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jasper Trietsch|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jasper Trietsch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jasper Trietsch|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jasper Trietsch|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|21 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|13 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12875-017-0605-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.