General practitioners’ views on (long-term) prescription and use of problematic and potentially inappropriate medication for oldest-old patients—A qualitative interview study with GPs (CIM-TRIAD study)
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 August 2016
Accepted: 26 January 2017
Published: 17 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Clyne|
|21 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Parker Magin|
|22 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Nadine Pohontsch|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Barbara Clyne|
|16 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Parker Magin|
|25 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nadine Pohontsch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12875-017-0595-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.