Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective – a qualitative study

  • Fiona A Stevenson1Email author,
  • Cicely Kerr2,
  • Elizabeth Murray2 and
  • Irwin Nazareth1
BMC Family Practice20078:47

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-47

Received: 18 April 2007

Accepted: 16 August 2007

Published: 16 August 2007

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Apr 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Broom
16 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Watt
18 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harry McConnell
15 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Stevenson
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Stevenson
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Broom
27 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Watt
5 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Harry McConnell
10 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - Fiona Stevenson
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Aug 2007 Editorially accepted
16 Aug 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-8-47

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Hampstead Campus
(2)
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Archway Campus, Level 2 Holburn Union Building

Advertisement