Exploring men's and women's experiences of depression and engagement with health professionals: more similarities than differences? A qualitative interview study
© Emslie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 19 December 2006
Accepted: 24 July 2007
Published: 24 July 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Kilmartin|
|26 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Brownhill|
|15 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne Elizabeth Rogers|
|17 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Emslie|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Kilmartin|
|13 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne Elizabeth Rogers|
|23 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Suzanne Brownhill|
|27 Jun 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Emslie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jul 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Emslie|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Jul 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jul 2007||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jul 2007||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-8-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.