The Single Item Literacy Screener: Evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability
© Morris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 23 November 2005
Accepted: 24 March 2006
Published: 24 March 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Nov 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Pignone|
|23 Jan 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lorraine Wallace|
|13 Feb 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Nancy S Morris|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Feb 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Pignone|
|15 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lorraine Wallace|
|21 Mar 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Nancy S Morris|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Mar 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Mar 2006||Editorially accepted|
|24 Mar 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-7-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.