A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: Is what they tell us important and true?
© Cardarelli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 25 October 2005
Accepted: 03 March 2006
Published: 03 March 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Oct 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Nov 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Howard Brody|
|18 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin|
|10 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Cardarelli|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jan 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin|
|23 Jan 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Howard Brody|
|28 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Roberto Cardarelli|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Mar 2006||Editorially accepted|
|3 Mar 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-7-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.