Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: A report from the ASIPS Collaborative
© Baldwin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 22 November 2004
Accepted: 08 March 2005
Published: 08 March 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Nov 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Dec 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ron Keren|
|29 Dec 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anton Kuzel|
|14 Feb 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Elizabeth Staton|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Feb 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Feb 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Elizabeth Staton|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Feb 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Mar 2005||Editorially accepted|
|8 Mar 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-6-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.