Comparison of perceived quality amongst migrant and local patients using primary health care delivered by community health centres in Shenzhen, China
© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 January 2014
Accepted: 17 April 2014
Published: 29 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zhaokang Yuan|
|2 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - qing wan|
|27 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Xiaolin Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Xiaolin Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|17 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|29 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-15-76|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.