Identifying patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms in electronic medical records in primary care: a validation study
© den Boeft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 February 2014
Accepted: 28 May 2014
Published: 5 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Feb 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Morriss|
|15 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kees van Boven|
|22 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Madelon den Boeft|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-15-109|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.